(561) 764-4041 [email protected]

In today’s society, the right to free speech and civic engagement is a cornerstone of our democracy. This right is enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is a fundamental aspect of our way of life. However, there are those who seek to suppress this right by utilizing frivolous and meritless lawsuits known as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP). These lawsuits are often used to censor individuals or entities who engage in protected speech and impose upon them the burden of a legal defense.

SLAPP lawsuits can have a detrimental effect on a defendant, causing unwarranted harm and perpetuating a chilling effect on free expression and civic engagement. To counteract these deleterious effects, some jurisdictions have enacted anti-SLAPP statutes that provide for expedited resolution and protections for citizens engaged in lawful public discourse. Florida is one such jurisdiction that recognizes the importance of free speech and has enacted anti-SLAPP laws to protect its citizens from SLAPP lawsuits.

Florida’s anti-SLAPP law provides for an expedited process for dismissing SLAPP suits and awards reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party. This helps to deter SLAPP lawsuits and protects the rights of citizens to engage in public discourse without fear of legal retaliation. In Florida, a defendant in a SLAPP lawsuit can seek relief by filing a motion to strike the complaint under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. If the court grants the motion, the SLAPP suit is dismissed, and the defendant is awarded reasonable attorney fees. This efficient and cost-effective mechanism serves as a deterrent against the filing of SLAPP actions and helps to protect citizens’ rights to free speech and civic engagement.

Very often, SLAPP suits are used to silence clients and even attorneys with aims to silence individuals who obtain knowledge of damages or possible damages a product or procedure a business may be involved with. Under The Florida Sunshine in Litigation Act, s. 69.081, F.S, a trial court may enter an order that classifies a product as a “public hazard” if it has caused, or is likely to cause, injury to the public. A “public hazard” is defined as any device, instrument, person, procedure, or product that is likely to cause injury. The act also requires the public disclosure of confidential information related to a public hazard. For instance, in cases involving loan servicers, it has been observed that they often engage in unethical practices, such as providing incorrect information, failing to act on borrower complaints, illegally cheating borrowers out of their rights to lower payments, deceiving private loan borrowers, and causing harm to the credit of disabled borrowers, including injured veterans. These entities have also been known to use SLAPP suits to silence individuals and attorneys who aim to bring attention to these unethical practices.

The Florida Sunshine in Litigation Act serves as a countermeasure to SLAPP suits, promoting transparency and accountability in the legal system. It allows for greater public access to court records and proceedings, enabling citizens to review and inspect court records, attend court proceedings, and obtain copies of court documents. The act applies to all civil cases, including civil lawsuits, appeals, and other proceedings filed in the Florida courts, ensuring that the public has access to information about the potential harm caused by products and procedures offered by businesses.

Nevertheless, it is important to note that the protections provided by Florida’s anti-SLAPP law are not absolute and may not apply in all cases. It is advisable to consult with an experienced attorney who can advise on the applicability of these laws in specific situations. At the Joshua Horton law firm, our goal is to give a voice to the voiceless and ensure that your rights to free speech and civic engagement are protected. If you find yourself targeted by a SLAPP suit, do not hesitate to reach out to our firm. We will work tirelessly to defend your rights and ensure that your voice is heard.

In conclusion, the anti-SLAPP law in Florida is a crucial tool for protecting citizens’ rights to free speech and civic engagement. This law provides for an expedited process for dismissing SLAPP suits and awards reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party, serving as a deterrent against the filing of SLAPP actions. Whether you are a private citizen, an entity, or an organization, it is important to understand the protections provided by Florida’s anti-SLAPP law and to seek experienced counsel to assess the applicability of these protections in any given circumstance. At the Joshua Horton law firm, we are committed to defending your rights and ensuring that your voice is heard.

Contact Joshua to have your voice be heard.

13 + 13 =

Legal Examination of Allegations Against Dividend Finance in the Minnesota Attorney General’s Lawsuit

In recent news, the State of Minnesota, led by Attorney General Keith Ellison, has launched a civil enforcement action against several prominent financial entities in the solar lending industry, including Dividend Finance. This lawsuit underscores significant...

Khan v. Affordable Solar Roof & Air LLC and Dividend Finance Inc. – A Legal Battle for Consumer Rights

In a significant legal action that underscores the growing concerns around the solar panel installation industry, Zamena Khan has filed a lawsuit against Affordable Solar Roof & Air LLC (ASRA) and Dividend Finance Inc., alleging a series of fraudulent practices, contract breaches, and elder exploitation. This case, set in the Circuit Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, represents a crucial fight for justice and consumer protection in the face of deceptive business practices.

Piercing the Solar Corporate Veil: The Intricacies of Civil Conspiracy and Organized Crime within the Consumer Solar Panel and Financial Sectors

The Joshua S. Horton Law Firm, PA not only uncovers the collaborative deceit among contractors, lenders, marketers, and debt purchasers but also highlights a particularly vile facet of exploitation: targeting elderly individuals through illegal practices, in violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) and other Florida Laws designed to protect vulnerable consumers.

Legal Implications of the Florida Appellate Panel Decision on Anti-SLAPP Legislation and Attorney Conduct

The recent Florida appellate panel decision, as reported by Law360, highlights a pivotal moment in the intersection of legal settlements, attorney obligations, and Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) legislation in Florida. The panel's decision...

Arbitration vs. Litigation in Court: A Comparative Analysis involving Solar Panel Fraud

In the legal landscape, particularly in jurisdictions like Florida and Washington D.C., two prominent methods of dispute resolution are arbitration and litigation. Both have their unique characteristics, benefits, and drawbacks. This article aims to provide a comparative analysis of these two methods, assisting legal practitioners and clients in making informed decisions. Here at the Joshua S. Horton Law Firm, PA, we understand these differences and will use the appropriate tool for the case.

Understanding Florida’s Door-to-Door Solicitation Statute and Its Impact on Solar Panel Contracts

In recent years, Florida has seen a significant increase in door-to-door sales, particularly in the solar panel industry. While this sales method can be convenient for consumers, it also raises certain legal considerations under Florida’s door-to-door solicitation statute, codified in §501.022, Florida Statutes. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this statute and its implications for solar panel contracts, including the validity of arbitration clauses in contracts that violate the statute.

Navigating the Legal Maze: A Case Study in the Predatory Student Loan Debt Industry

With the court denying GM Law Firm’s motion for summary judgment, the case is now advancing to a jury trial in January 2024. This development is not just a procedural step; it symbolizes a critical juncture in the fight for accountability in an industry often criticized for exploiting vulnerable borrowers.

The Consequences of Substance Abuse for Professionals: Understanding the Legal Ramifications and the Critical Role of Legal Representation

Introduction In the realm of professional careers such as law, medicine, aviation, nursing, and pharmacy, maintaining a standard of professional conduct and personal integrity is paramount. As professionals, individuals in these fields hold positions of trust and...

Debunking Common Misconceptions about DUIs in Florida

Welcome to The Joshua S. Horton Law Firm, PA, where we strive to provide accurate and insightful information to our clients. In today's blog post, we'll be addressing some common misconceptions surrounding DUIs in the state of Florida. As your trusted legal partner...

The Dark Side of Solar Power: Unmasking Fraud, Breach of Contract, and Exploitation in the U.S.

Solar panel fraud doesn’t stop with the companies directly involved; lenders also find themselves liable. Sunlight Financial, Vision Solar’s lender, recently declared bankruptcy, leaving consumers in a precarious situation. Lenders may face legal consequences for their role in financing alleged fraudulent solar ventures, adding financial losses to the growing list of victims, and attempting to collect debts from contracts that were under, or never performed.